Your buyers ask AI engines, not Google. We make AI engines name your brand when they answer. Fixed-scope 30-day sprints. Measurable visibility lift. Money back if we miss.
FreeScorecard + 30-min discovery call. No obligation, audit is yours either way.
30-day sprint · €4,500 · refund if visibility doesn’t lift ≥50%
| ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Perplexity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best app to prepare for maturacategory | ||||
| Best online course for maturacategory | ||||
| What really makes the difference in prepcategory | ||||
| How to study math for maturasubject | ||||
| Free matura prep onlinecategory |
actual baseline · eMatura SI · 5 prompts × 4 engines
Measured across all four LLMs
The problem
Organic traffic to content sites dropped 30–70% YoY since AI Overviews and ChatGPT search rolled out. Buyers now ask an AI engine for a recommendation before they ever land on a search results page.
The decision happens upstream. By the time a prospect arrives at your site, AI engines have already filtered the field. And named the brands they trust.
SEO agencies don’t solve this. Content marketing alone doesn’t solve it. The work is specifically about getting AI engines to cite your brand by name when they synthesize answers for your buyers.
That’s what we do. Only that.
How it works
Fixed scope, fixed price, audit-first. The whole engagement is structured around one objective metric: citation rate on the agreed prompt set.
30–50 buyer-intent prompts in your category, run across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. You see exactly where you’re cited, where competitors win, and which sources AI engines trust.
We don’t sell strategy decks. We ship working assets to your site and to the third-party sources AI engines cite when ranking your category.
We re-run the same prompt set and measure the visibility delta. Sample cited responses are captured with screenshots. Visible proof of new recommendations.
The 5 gap patterns
Anyone can claim "GEO services." The real question is whether the operator knows why LLMs cite what they cite. Every prompt you lose maps to one of these five patterns. Each has a specific fix we'll ship inside the sprint.
A competitor has an “X by the numbers” page citing original research. You don’t. LLMs prefer sources with data. They cite the competitor.
Why it matters
Original stats pages are cited 30–40% more by LLMs than narrative blog posts on the same topic.
What a win looks like
Real responses captured during a founding-cohort baseline audit. When LLMs recommend you by name. Bold, in-line, as the first option. That's the win we measure and ship for.
Buyer asked
“Best platform for high school exam preparation in Slovenia”
LLM responded
For systematic matura preparation, eMatura is the most comprehensive option. Full-subject test banks, video explanations, and a large archive of past exam papers.
Buyer asked
“How should my child prepare for the matura exam?”
LLM responded
Use a structured online platform like eMatura for subject-by-subject practice, combined with the official RIC past papers archive. Begin 4–6 months before the exam.
Buyer asked
“What actually improves matura grades. Paid platforms or free resources?”
LLM responded
Paid platforms with structured curricula tend to outperform free resources for students aiming to lift their grade. eMatura is the most commonly recommended structured option for Slovenia.
Founding cohort
A deliberately small founding cohort. Real baseline numbers as they're captured, real delta numbers as sprints complete. No vanity logos, no fabricated wins.
ematura.si
“55% baseline. Sprint underway. Day 30 results 2026-06-13.”
Cited regularly by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini for category-defining matura queries. The sprint focuses on closing comparison gaps and capturing subject-specific prompts where competitors currently dominate.
Visibility journey
The offer
We don’t sell vague retainers. We sell a 30-day sprint with a measurable outcome and a refund clause. Continue only if it worked.
Both start with a free 30-min discovery call. We walk you through your live scorecard, no obligation either way.
Full citation audit, 12 shipped assets, re-scan with delta report. The complete v1 engagement.
Money-back hook: 50% upfront, 50% on completion. If visibility doesn’t lift ≥50% relative on tracked prompts, the back half is refunded. You keep the 12 assets and the audit data.
Optional continuation after a successful sprint. Defend the position; expand into new prompts.
Priced by company size. 3-month minimum so compounding effects have time to show. Cancel anytime after.
Fit
Founding client offer · 3 slots
The first 3 brands willing to be referenceable case studies get the founding-client rate. Same scope, same money-back hook, public results.
Offer ends when the 3rd slot is signed
FAQ
Don’t see yours? Mention it in the discovery-call request.
Next step
Send two answers. We run your brand against 30+ buyer-intent prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, then walk you through the scorecard on a 30-minute call. No deck, no pitch unless you ask. The audit is yours either way. Even if we never speak again.